The Mechanism · Gated-generation receipt

gen-define-the-double-slit-interference-pattern-and-give-one-sho-d039

stable pending witness
2026-05-29 05:36:52 UTC · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Prompt

Define the double-slit interference pattern and give one short worked example.
78 chars

Generation

# Double-Slit Interference Pattern ## Definition The **double-slit interference pattern** occurs when coherent light passes through two narrow, closely-spaced slits and creates an alternating pattern of bright and dark fringes on a screen. This happens because light waves from each slit overlap and interfere: - **Constructive interference** (bright fringes): waves arrive in phase - **Destructive interference** (dark fringes): waves arrive out of phase **Condition for bright fringes:** $$d \sin\theta = m\lambda$$ where: - *d* = slit separation - *θ* = angle from central axis - *m* = order number (0, ±1, ±2, ...) - *λ* = wavelength of light --- ## Worked Example **Problem:** Red laser light (λ = 650 nm) passes through two slits separated by d = 0.30 mm. A screen is placed L = 2.0 m away. Find the distance between the central bright fringe and the first bright fringe. **Solution:** For small angles: $\sin\theta \approx \tan\theta = \frac{y}{L}$ For first bright fringe (m = 1): $$d \sin\theta = \lambda$$ $$\sin\theta = \frac{\lambda}{d} = \frac{650 \times 10^{-9}}{0.30 \times 10^{-3}} = 2.17 \times 10^{-3}$$ Distance from center: $$y_1 = L\tan\theta \approx L\sin\theta = 2.0 \times 2.17 \times 10^{-3}$$ $$y_1 = 4.3 \text{ mm}$$ The first bright fringe appears **4.3 mm** from the center.
22 tokens in · 454 tokens out · 8225 ms · $0.0069

The four gates

RED
pass
no disqualifying input patterns detected
FLOOR
pass
output above protective minimum; no mismatches
WAY
pass
no declared way_path (Way check NA); no coercion language
EXECUTION
deferred
no witnesses available (Witness Roll not yet constituted)

Verifier results

scripture_anchors NOT_APPLICABLE
0 Scripture citation(s) extracted
theology_doctrine NOT_APPLICABLE
no doctrine keyword patterns detected

Metrics

Total latency
8232.0 ms
Base LLM
8224.5 ms
Verifiers
0.4 ms
Gates
0.1 ms
Cost
$0.0069

Trail

05:36:52 received prompt_chars=78 verifiers=['scripture_anchors', 'theology_doctrine']
05:36:52 red_gate decision=pass reason=no disqualifying input patterns detected
05:37:00 base_llm_call model=anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5 tokens_in=22 tokens_out=454 latency_ms=8224.5 cost_usd=0.0069
05:37:00 verifier:scripture_anchors verdict=NOT_APPLICABLE summary=0 Scripture citation(s) extracted
05:37:00 verifier:theology_doctrine verdict=NOT_APPLICABLE summary=no doctrine keyword patterns detected
05:37:00 floor_gate decision=pass reason=output above protective minimum; no mismatches
05:37:00 way_gate decision=pass reason=no declared way_path (Way check NA); no coercion language
05:37:00 execution_gate decision=deferred reason=no witnesses available (Witness Roll not yet constituted)
05:37:00 signed hash_algo=sha256 hash=sha256:5d5abb47c578fd0876dc916a5f0469dd8aeb486a548d9d6bd895814627eee9bc

Content hash

sha256:5d5abb47c578fd0876dc916a5f0469dd8aeb486a548d9d6bd895814627eee9bc

SHA256 over the canonical JSON (excluding this field). Tamper detection. Ed25519 signing planned for v2 once the operator’s signing key is provisioned on disk.

Bring another teaching · Run a discernment