The Mechanism · Gated-generation receipt

gen-define-asymptotic-big-o-complexity-and-give-one-short-worked-b63f

stable pending witness
2026-05-29 07:47:50 UTC · anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5

Prompt

Define asymptotic (big-O) complexity and give one short worked example.
71 chars

Generation

# Asymptotic (Big-O) Complexity **Definition:** Big-O notation describes the **upper bound** of an algorithm's growth rate as input size approaches infinity. We say f(n) = O(g(n)) if there exist positive constants c and n₀ such that: **f(n) ≤ c · g(n)** for all n ≥ n₀ In simpler terms: Big-O tells us the worst-case scenario for how runtime/space grows with input size, ignoring constant factors and lower-order terms. ## Worked Example **Problem:** Find the Big-O complexity of this function: ``` f(n) = 3n² + 5n + 10 ``` **Solution:** 1. **Identify the dominant term:** As n grows large, n² grows much faster than n or constants - When n = 100: 3(10,000) vs 5(100) vs 10 - The n² term dominates 2. **Drop constants and lower-order terms:** - f(n) = 3n² + 5n + 10 - Drop coefficient: ~~3~~n² - Drop smaller terms: n² ~~+ 5n + 10~~ 3. **Result:** **f(n) = O(n²)** **Verification:** We need f(n) ≤ c·n² for some c and large enough n. - Choose c = 4 and n₀ = 10 - For n ≥ 10: 3n² + 5n + 10 ≤ 3n² + n² = 4n² ✓ Therefore, the algorithm has **quadratic complexity**.
24 tokens in · 408 tokens out · 9282 ms · $0.0062

The four gates

RED
pass
no disqualifying input patterns detected
FLOOR
pass
output above protective minimum; no mismatches
WAY
pass
no declared way_path (Way check NA); no coercion language
EXECUTION
deferred
no witnesses available (Witness Roll not yet constituted)

Verifier results

scripture_anchors NOT_APPLICABLE
0 Scripture citation(s) extracted
theology_doctrine NOT_APPLICABLE
no doctrine keyword patterns detected

Metrics

Total latency
9289.0 ms
Base LLM
9282.2 ms
Verifiers
0.5 ms
Gates
0.1 ms
Cost
$0.0062

Trail

07:47:50 received prompt_chars=71 verifiers=['scripture_anchors', 'theology_doctrine']
07:47:50 red_gate decision=pass reason=no disqualifying input patterns detected
07:47:59 base_llm_call model=anthropic/claude-sonnet-4-5 tokens_in=24 tokens_out=408 latency_ms=9282.2 cost_usd=0.0062
07:47:59 verifier:scripture_anchors verdict=NOT_APPLICABLE summary=0 Scripture citation(s) extracted
07:47:59 verifier:theology_doctrine verdict=NOT_APPLICABLE summary=no doctrine keyword patterns detected
07:47:59 floor_gate decision=pass reason=output above protective minimum; no mismatches
07:47:59 way_gate decision=pass reason=no declared way_path (Way check NA); no coercion language
07:47:59 execution_gate decision=deferred reason=no witnesses available (Witness Roll not yet constituted)
07:47:59 signed hash_algo=sha256 hash=sha256:a901df3cd21ec4c486d8099cb31ef9b1f24e0d6a7822706162f955431da4a9e0

Content hash

sha256:a901df3cd21ec4c486d8099cb31ef9b1f24e0d6a7822706162f955431da4a9e0

SHA256 over the canonical JSON (excluding this field). Tamper detection. Ed25519 signing planned for v2 once the operator’s signing key is provisioned on disk.

Bring another teaching · Run a discernment