Two poles — abstract/formal vs material/embodied (the two trees)

The grid's dominant complementary structure is a SINGLE axis from a formal/abstract pole (reasoning, encoding, order, discreteness, uncertainty, authority_trust) to a material/embodied pole (physical_substance, metabolism, conservation_balance, time_sequence, symmetry). The strongest anti-correlations run ACROSS this divide (reasoning <-> physical_substance, reasoning <-> metabolism), NOT within the proposed supersymmetry duals. HONEST STATUS: plausible — intuition proposes, the assay disposes; this is the operator's seed, not a verified result. Caveat: Held as a PLACEHOLDER TO TRUTH — a CANDIDATE refinement, not confirmed. One test on a small, partly-sparse grid (uncertainty/discreteness/order/symmetry have only 5-6 carriers); a clean 2-pole fit can be an artifact of how dimensions were assigned. 'symmetry' landing on the MATERIAL pole is empirical and against intuition — reported as found, not corrected to fit.